Bukkake: A form of fetish pornography, first popularized in Japan, in which men, usually many men, ejaculate onto the face of a woman. Usually without having sex first. And frequently involving humiliation. And no. I'm NOT into this.

wow, that's a pretty cool music video though...

I'll just keep thinking bukkake is a Russian hors d'oeuvre with cheese and eggplant.

however disgusting it may be, it didn't stop you from ASKING me if i wanted some 'light bukkake' all weekend long...like a little kid who just learned a bad word, i forgot to simply stop reacting, it might have been over a little bit quicker. :P

bukkake is a kind of sushi! mmm bukkake sushi!!!!! more bukkake please!

touche.

i guess i did bury that joke.

but now that you've brought it to your journal, melly can carry the joke out from here and you'll still get your bukkake fix! same great bukkake, less personal mess!

oooook then, Im leaving the whole bukkake thing alone. This story reminded me of a website I found recently and I just wanted to share the beauty for those, like me, who might not be ready for those OTHER websites *L* www.insomniagallery.com/
enjoy!

light bukkake? what next, light bestiality? light pedophilia?

"Ummm, yes, a bukkake-lite with ummm, what's good here? Oh yeah, a side of fat-free anal!!"

thx for the funny post. :)

I was really shocked when someone pointed me to this post. This is pretty disappointing. You claim to have a policy about not reprinting other people's words in your blog without permission, and yet you've reprinted *misquoted hearsay* here, after I already explained to you that it was incorrect.

I didn't want to get involved in this, and after I saw this in Tassy's post and talked to you about it I figured I'd let it go. But since you seem set on making points for yourself at the photographer's expense anyway, I'm going to jump in.

According to the photographer (who was not stoned during this conversation), in response to Tassy's inquiry he had suggested that some colleagues of his might be interested working with her, depending on what she was willing to do. She asked what that might include and he said "light bondage and bukkake." Light being the qualifier for bondage there, not bukkake.

By republishing Tassy's misquote in this very PUBLIC place, you're not only perpetuating the false implication that the photographer is involved in that stuff (which he's not) and that he was trying to get Tassy involved in that stuff with him (which he certainly wasn't and in fact he was yanking her chain somewhat), but you're also making a joke at his expense -- which is completely unfair.

No, it's not a huge deal and the photographer's name isn't disclosed so perhaps you could say it's all in good fun and "no harm no foul." But I always thought you had more integrity than that.

I hear what you are saying. And I am very sorry that I upset you. Our friendship is very important to me, and I am sad that I may have bruised it. I wondered whether this could be read as a shot against the photographer, and I tried to prevent that in this post.

I recognize your concern with this story, but, honestly, I have to disagree with you. I should know better than to disagree with a lawyer but I'm a masochist.

As a rule, you are right, I don't reprint private letters that other people write to me. And in this case, I did not. I am quoting part of a conversation. And as it is integral to the humor in the story, there is almost no way around that.

I am telling the story of this experience from my perspective and my perspective only. The events that happened I was either involved with or witnessed directly. I have said nothing negative about the photographer. I have not mentioned anyone or implicated anyone in any way.

The most negative thing said in this post is that neither of us had a positive vibe, and I stand by that statement as truth. Had I stated my reasons for my reservations or mentioned in detail why I was not comfortable with him, then I think my post would have been mean spirited and directed.

As far as the light bukkake, yes, I am making a joke. And yes, it is a misquote. But I disagree that it's at his expense. My final comment I think indicates that. I express that I hope he is making a joke because I thought it was so funny. And I still find it very, very funny. It's a good joke!

As eventually brought to my attention, the intent of the comment was made a joke - something that was not clear to me at the time. I think that makes my story even LESS at his expense. I'm playing up HIS joke.

I think there is very real humor in that quote - whether intended or not. It is funny. And I think the quote qualifies as funny enough to share publicly. I think everyone who reads my site reads it as largely tongue in cheek. I hope that is how people continue to read it.

If the photographer has read this and feels slighted or offended, I invite him to comment here (anonymously if he prefers) or to contact me directly.

I'm sorry I disappointed you B. You are my friend and it was never my intent. Although I stand by this story, I should have bounced it off you first. For this I apologize.